158.8 billion tax to become the third richest person in the world? Here’s the Zuckerberg problem

Facebook founder Zuckerberg is worth more than $100 billion for the first time on Thursday, making him the third richest person in the world, foreign media reported. The value of Bezos has soared by $75 billion this year, and that of Zuckerberg has risen by 22 billion, according to the Bloomberg billionaire index. < / P > < p > on the one hand is the shrinking economy, on the other is the rising wealth. In the past six months, the number of unemployed people in the United States has been on the rise, and it has broken through the peak of the great depression. Recently, U.S. senators Bernie Sanders, ed Mackey, Kirsten Gillibrand and others have proposed a new bill. < / P > < p > under the bill, U.S. billionaires are required to pay a one-time 60% tax on wealth growth between March 18, 2020 and January 1, 2021, while the tax is applied to all Americans’ health care expenses for a year. < / P > < p > subsequently, in the press release attached to the bill, the cost of wealth growth during the period from March 18 to August 5 was calculated, among which: < / P > < p > first, the wealth of these rich people is presented in the form of shares. If tax is to be levied, is it paid in stock or in cash? If it’s cash, I’m afraid Bezos and others will not be able to take out the money even if it’s cash. < / P > < p > Second, if 60% tax is levied on these increased wealth at one time, it is bound to cause these rich people to redistribute their wealth. Moreover, these technology enterprises are pillar enterprises in the United States, and if they have excessive behavior, they will inevitably have an immeasurable impact on their economy. < / P > < p > < p >Third, this is just the wishful thinking of members. The rise of stock prices is the result of economic operation. If we impose heavy taxes on the other party because of the growth of wealth, it is obviously against the objective law. < / P > < p > it is learned that some councillors had proposed to tax these rich people before, but in the end, it was not settled. The underlying reason is also based on the above considerations. Therefore, I think that the members’ proposals are more gimmicks, the purpose may be to increase their support rate, but it is basically impossible for them to achieve the goal. According to reports, at the end of March this year, Amazon launched an Amazon rescue fund to rescue logistics outsourcing drivers and temporary workers, providing subsidies ranging from $400 to $5000 for hundreds of thousands of informal employees. < p > < p > What’s wonderful is that after Amazon has provided us $25 million in donations, it has also opened the channels for public donations, starting with $25. < / P > < p > using public money to help employees of Amazon immediately aroused strong public opposition. Finally, Amazon had to issue a statement saying, “we don’t expect you to do this, but you can donate voluntarily if you want. It is not only a matter of today that he is harsh on employees, so it is even more unnecessary to treat outsiders. Not long ago, some people in Manhattan had been outside the Bezos mansion for 24 hours, asking for a tax on the rich, but Bezos and others did not say anything. < p > < p > moreover, his personal wealth soared by $13 billion in one day on July 20. According to Forbes real-time data, Bezos is worth more than $190 billion. < / P > < p > so it’s almost impossible to take $42.8 billion from these people. Therefore, on the whole, the US congressman’s proposal is just a gimmick, which should not be taken seriously. Science Discovery