answer blows with blows? Why shouldn’t iPhone be banned in China

Prior to this, the U.S. ban on tiktok has been in the forefront of the hot search list. However, the aftereffect has not subsided. The new ban also points to wechat, which requires that from August 6, American individuals and enterprises will be prohibited from conducting any wechat related transactions with Tencent in 45 days. As soon as this incident occurred, not only did Tencent’s market value fall by 10%, but also evaporated HK $268.3 billion, which made netizens even more explosive. < / P > < p > whenever similar incidents occur, we always find a rule, that is, a considerable number of netizens will target Apple and call for a “patriotic” campaign to boycott the iPhone. Why shouldn’t Apple’s iPhone be banned in China? Today, we will make an in-depth analysis from three aspects. First of all, it is an irrational thinking and a violation of the WTO trade agreement to ban the sale of apples blindly. Since China’s accession to the WTO, we have abided by the relevant regulations and never violated the WTO trade agreement. The blind ban on Apple sales not only violates the WTO agreement, but also puts us under the pressure of public opinion in the international community. At the same time, it is easy for countries like the United States to grasp the story, so it will not be us who open the Pandora’s box. On the other hand, only by creating a better market environment can China’s economic development be promoted. We are not only a big manufacturing country, but also a big import and export trade country. It is the demeanor of a big country to safeguard the sound development of global free trade and guarantee the basic rights and interests of every legal enterprise. < / P > < p > we treat all foreign enterprises equally, and apple is no exception. Therefore, as long as apple operates legally within the scope of Chinese laws, we will not ban its products unless it no longer complies with the relevant domestic laws. Ren Zhengfei, Huawei’s boss, shows a real entrepreneurial spirit. He has publicly said that he is the first to oppose the use of state power to sanction apple. “Don’t be so biased, my family is still using the iPhone now,” he said in an interview Such a pattern has to be admired. In today’s globalization, it is very important to establish a fair and just market order. With the development of reform and opening up for so many years, it is rare and difficult to gain the trust of foreign enterprises. < / P > < p > in short, we still need to take a rational view of the ban on iPhone sales. The incident that Chinese people smashed Japanese cars before should not be repeated. Of course, domestic enterprises have been treated unfairly in the United States. Naturally, we need to fight back. Who are the targets of counterattack and how to fight back? Naturally, there are experts to consider. In the tide of globalization, no one can be alone. As we all know, most of the world’s iPhones are manufactured, assembled, produced and packaged in China, and its huge industrial chain system affects the employment of millions of people. According to the data on Apple’s official website, Apple has created 5 million jobs directly or indirectly in mainland China through China’s supply chain, procurement and investment. The app store ecosystem of IOS alone supports more than 1.8 million jobs Since the release of the store, domestic developers have made more than 110 billion yuan in revenue, and the number is still rising. < p > < p > a netizen here said, “I don’t believe that without apple, would millions of Chinese families in this supply chain really not find another way out and wait for starvation to die? On the contrary, most of the talents working in this supply chain will make new contributions to China’s enterprises and technological development if they join other industries. ” < / P > < p > it’s hard to put yourself in the other’s shoes if you don’t speak with low back pain. Not to mention the difficulties in the transformation of this huge supply chain in a short period of time. Even if domestic mobile phone manufacturers can fill the gap in Apple’s supply chain, they can’t afford to pay the price. Maybe most of the supply chain manufacturers will be forced to close down. Secondly, the domestic industrial chain has to face the threat of other competitors. After all, there are many countries with lower labor costs than ours. < / P > < p > therefore, the “one size fits all” loss is immeasurable. After all, millions of families are implicated behind the 5 million practitioners. Those who are directly or indirectly involved in the iPhone industry chain should be deeply touched. < / P > < p > at present, China has the most complete range, the widest range of materials, different prices of iPhone case and film, and strange third-party accessories on the market. These seemingly insignificant products, after years of industrial chain precipitation, also formed a large market. It can be said that there are countless third-party industrial chains based on iPhone. The so-called “pull one hair and move the whole body”, such is the case with small accessories, let alone developers engaged in IOS software. < / P > < p > we know that because of the huge traffic and ecological closeness of Apple App store, the revenue of its service business is soaring every year. And there are more than 1.8 million IOS software programmers in China, which naturally correspond to the domestic market. If the iPhone is banned, they will lose their income, even if the cost of changing jobs is huge. < / P > < p > on the other hand, banning Apple sales will lose hundreds of billions of taxes. According to the 17% tax levied on each generation of iPhones, with the huge sales of Apple’s iPhones in China every year, the import tax alone can reach hundreds of billion yuan, excluding taxes on other products. < / P > < p > the domestic mobile phone market has developed so fast that it has only been a few years since it became the world’s largest smartphone market. It is just because of the benign competition that a number of excellent mobile phone manufacturers have been born. The fierce competition among mobile phone manufacturers will eliminate inferior products and ultimately benefit users. When Apple iPhone just entered the domestic market, there were almost no competitors. After a few years of development, we can see the strength of domestic mobile phone manufacturers. < / P > < p > for example, oppo’s breakthrough in super flash charging technology, vivo’s accumulation of beauty and off screen fingerprint technology, and Xiaomi’s strength in cost performance ratio have all taken market share from apple. Huawei invests a huge amount of R & D funds every year, and creates the double flagship of P series and mate series to compete with apple in the field of high-end mobile phones. < / P > < p > without apple as a strong competitor, the progress of domestic mobile phones will not be so fast. At the same time, Apple’s high standards for the supply chain also force domestic supply chain enterprises to make technological progress. Bozhong Seiko has grown from 700 employees to 3100 employees since it became an apple automation equipment supplier in 2010. With the cooperation with apple, they have become a world-class digital factory system solution provider and service provider. < p > < p > “Apple’s requirements for equipment precision and rapid delivery capability are very strict, which has played a very good role in promoting the training of the team,” Lu Shaolin, chairman of Bozhong, once said, “Apple has driven the demand for equipment in the whole Chinese market and opened up the market for automatic equipment manufacturing.” < / P > < p > on the one hand, the emergence of iPhone has promoted the technological progress of domestic mobile phone manufacturers; on the other hand, Apple’s strict audit standards for its own supply chain have driven the progress of the whole domestic upstream and downstream industrial chain. From the perspective of benign competition, the absence of iPhone will not be conducive to the rapid development of the mobile phone market. < / P > < p > If iPhone is banned in China, Apple’s stock price will plummet in the short term, and the cost of its products will rise. Apple can invest its supply chain in India and Southeast Asia, where the labor cost is lower. These problems are not fatal to apple. On the contrary, at least for now, the direct ban on iPhone sales in China will do more harm than good. < p > < p > BaoJianFeng comes from sharpening, and plum blossom fragrance comes from bitter cold. Looking back on history, there are always striking similarities. There were many difficulties encountered, and the conditions at that time were far more difficult than they are now. However, the huge pressure did not knock us down. The more pressure it exerted, the more urged us to unite. For domestic mobile phones, we need to master the commanding heights of technology. Only when we are strong, can we be the hard truth. Developed a “plug and play” solar power generation scheme, and “5B” won a $12 million round a financing