The reason for this is very simple. Huawei, as a big brother, was born in 1987. Huawei has been deeply engaged in the field of reputation communication technology for many years. It has a strong technical foundation and a huge talent pool in the fields of telecommunications, cloud computing and mobile intelligent terminals. What’s more, Huawei has a large enterprise background and continuous capital expenditure This is also an important reason why Huawei can grow rapidly in more than 30 years. < / P > < p > and oppo and vivo, known as the blue and green brothers, were hatched step by step in 1995. Oppo was established in 2004 to develop and produce Blu ray products, and then entered the MP3, MP4 and smartphone industries. Vivo was registered globally in 2009 and officially entered the smartphone field in 2011. It can be said that oppo and vivo have excellent hardware foundation since their establishment. They have a solid foundation in sound quality, image and other aspects. In addition, with the huge self support and local support step by step, oppo and vivo have little resistance to enter the smartphone industry. < / P > < p > compared with Huawei and blue and green brothers, Xiaomi was founded in 2010, only 10 years ago. The most important thing is that Xiaomi is an Internet enterprise with almost no money in terms of hardware, capital and background. It is such an enterprise that has become the number one smartphone in China in only four years, and has been successful in 2015 In the next few years, Xiaomi started again and became the youngest top 500 enterprise in the world. However, in the past ten years, millet has not been rid of the “assembly plant” infamy, because many people think millet has no self research, of which the most Tucao make complaints about the high pass chip. However, does Xiaomi really have no self-developed technology? The answer, of course, is No. According to the top 500 patent strength list of Chinese enterprises released at the 2019 China Marketing International Academic Conference and China creation exhibition main forum, Xiaomi ranked 16th; BCG released the world’s most innovative top 50 list in 2020, Xiaomi ranked 24th, and this is the third time Xiaomi has been on the list, previously ranked 35th in 2014 and 2016, and in many domestic countries Among mobile phone manufacturers, only Huawei and Xiaomi are on the list, while others are not. According to the data of the State Intellectual Property Office, Xiaomi communication ranked 17th with 588 patents in the first half of this year. Don’t forget that Xiaomi is only 10 years old, but its business partner has been more than 30 years old. This comparison itself is not reasonable. To put it bluntly, you are 33 years old and the child next door is 10 years old. You go out every day to tell others that the next door child is not as powerful as you. Isn’t this kind of logical thinking strange?
mobile phone make complaints about the development of the mobile phone chip. In fact, millet has not been done since 2014. That is, the fourth years since the establishment of millet, the company started to layout the mobile phone chip, and in 2017 released the first 5C mobile phone with the surging S1 chip. The friend who was founded in 1987 was also the first four years to set up the integrated circuit design center, but it was not until 2012. Just released the four core mobile phone processor chip k3v2, and carried on the ascend D market. Xiaomi chip has gone from zero to one for seven years, and the business partner has used it for 25 years. If there is something wrong with Xiaomi, it is that Xiaomi’s technology has been blocked after surging S1 chip. Since then, there has been no official news about surging. It is said that the streaming of surging S2 failed five times. However, at Xiaomi’s 10th anniversary speech on August 11, Lei Jun, the founder and CEO of Xiaomi technology, personally promised that Xiaomi had taken a hard core attitude towards the next 10 years. For the surging mobile phone chip, please rest assured that although this plan is more difficult, Xiaomi will persevere in moving forward! Lei Jun said that the Xiaomi industry fund has invested in more than 70 semiconductor and intelligent manufacturing companies, and Xiaomi will go far in hard core technologies such as chip research and development. It can be said that both Lei Jun and Xiaomi have been accelerating technological innovation in order to prevent foreign sanctions from getting stuck in their necks. However, compared with its friends, Xiaomi is far behind in terms of technology, capital, talents and background, so Xiaomi needs time to catch up. However, surprisingly, Lei Jun said that “although the surging chip encountered great difficulties, it did not give up!” After that, he was ridiculed again. The relevant we media said that “fully considering the difficulty coefficient of chip research and development and the transformation of mobile phone industry, I think the practical significance of continuing to develop chips by Xiaomi mobile phone is not great”, and said in the article that Xiaomi’s chip research and development is “greedy for profit”, “Xiaomi’s focus on continuous chip research and development is only a kind of propaganda and planning, but not easy to become practical.” 。 < / P > < p > < p > “not doing” self-study was criticized as assembling machine, and self-study was said to be meaningless. This self contradictory statement is really puzzling, and people can’t help asking: why is Xiaomi so difficult? In 2016 and 2020, Ren Lao, the founder of Huawei, repeatedly said: “we are on the eve of explosive innovation. A single flower is not a spring, but a hundred flowers should bloom.”. Lei Jun, the founder of Xiaomi technology, once said: a single branch is not spring, and all flowers bloom in spring. We sincerely hope that the muzzle of our friends will be raised by an inch, and our various media can also raise the muzzle by an inch. After all, there is no technology cooperation between the two countries. Continue ReadingASMC, a lithography maker, was one of TSMC’s 14 top suppliers last year