How do product managers judge whether they are following the right person?

Now more than two years have passed. Looking back on that time, I think the biggest harvest of this leader is that he has really cultivated my ability to lead a team and make products independently. < / P > < p > and in more than a year of working with this leader, I learned how to do in-depth user research, how to insight into the real needs of users, how to make a product from 0 to 1, and then from 1 to 10 or more More importantly, he showed me what a good leader should look like. < / P > < p > the leader is 15 years older than me, and has the working experience of many top companies. However, when I first worked together, I was not convinced that my ability was not blown out. Let me have a look? < / P > < p > after I calmed down, the leader took me to Starbucks to chat for a whole afternoon – from the past experience to personality development, from the current environment to the future of the workplace, we found a lot in common, and the deep communication of the leader completely “convinced” me. < / P > < p > in the days to come, although we will still argue about different views, I always agree with and respect this leader, and I am willing to work with him. < / P > < p > combined with my current environment, I would like to talk about “whether the product manager is following the right person” today. In other words, from what dimensions should we judge whether we are following a good leader. < / P > < p > some leaders will pay special attention to the details of the product, while some leaders do not care for the details at all. This is only the difference of leadership thinking or style, not the key point. < / P > < p > the key is whether the leader has strategic foresight and insight? Can we have a more accurate judgment on the trend and Prospect of the industry? < / P > < p > visionary leaders usually tell their subordinates the direction, and when we bump into headless flies, they will remind us what are the key points and where are the goals. < / P > < p > many leaders are actually “poisoned” by the small stories in the world. They are paranoid that they want to compete with product managers in product details and user experience, but they ignore that Apple’s success is not simply the ultimate user experience, but the innovation of the whole business model. < / P > < p > from the first time jobs persuaded major record companies to sell their records on iTunes, to the later app store set up on iPhone to sell tens of thousands of apps, all these are a complete subversion of the old business model, rather than a simple product experience. < / P > < p > therefore, the first point when looking at whether a leader is worth following is whether the leader has strategic vision, which will largely determine how far the project and even the company can go. < / P > < p > “strategic vision and insight” is one of the core differences between leaders and ordinary employees. We often say that we should not cover up strategic laziness with tactical diligence. If you find that the leaders you follow lack strategic vision, you must be very vigilant. < / P > < p > for example, in the real appliance industry, when I graduated from University, I worked in a traditional appliance enterprise. At that time, my leader had worked in that enterprise for more than eight years. < / P > < p > in his words, in addition to R & D, he has been in touch with all the production, finance, pre-sales and after-sales affairs in the company, which can be said to be very experienced. < / P > < p > when I was working in the company, as long as I followed the leader’s steps, I would not make mistakes and grow rapidly. This is because the development of business in traditional industries has a strong continuity, reasonable reference to previous experience can greatly improve the efficiency of latecomers. < / P > < p > but I went to an Internet company later, but the situation was very different – the Internet industry pays attention to business innovation and exploration, many new businesses need repeated trial and error and verification, and the old experience is difficult to use at this time. < / P > < p > so what is more needed in the Internet industry is independent thinking, mutual negation and practical solution. If the leaders habitually take me as the criterion and make a speech at this time, it will weaken the participation of other members in the team in disguise and reduce the reasonable trial and error space of subordinates, which is unfavorable for the development of team members in the past. < / P > < p > “difficult to accept different opinions” is actually human nature. People naturally have the need to protect “self dignity”. When others deny themselves, it is easy for people to fight back in order to protect their inner self-esteem. < p > > although I have to be calm and tolerant for a long time to make different products. But whenever I hear the doubt and negation, I will instinctively refute it, and feel uncomfortable. < / P > < p > finally overcome this point, because I want to understand one thing: what is the purpose for others to deny my opinion? Is it for the sake of the good product or just being unhappy with me. < / P > < p > in fact, most of the time, people’s negation will help me to see the whole picture of the product. Moreover, if we ponder over the negative opinions of others afterwards, we can still get a lot of gains. < / P > < p > therefore, when judging a leader, we can also observe whether the other party can accept different voices, because accepting different voices can contribute to continuous self denial, and a person can continue to grow. < / P > < p > “hypothesis” reflects that we are awed by the product, and we need to verify and prove it, but the conclusion shows that we have confirmed the result, and there is no need to doubt it. ——There is a big difference between the two. < / P > < p > therefore, enlightened leaders usually give subordinates a certain range of trial and error space, but any product manager with some savvy will grow up quickly after being slapped in the face by practical data and user feedback. < / P > < p > therefore, behind “giving subordinates room for trial and error”, it reflects that leaders are paying attention to our growth, rather than taking absolute results as the only guidance. One of the biggest changes I’ve made in the past few years is that I’ve changed from a very self-conscious and arbitrary person to an open and easy to accept his point of view, which is actually formed after being repeatedly slapped in the face by reality. < / P > < p > many years ago, there was a saying in sun Taoran’s book: the most terrible thing about entrepreneurship is struggle, that is, being in a half dead situation. < / P > < p > at that time, I didn’t have a deep feeling about this sentence until I later did an Internet Project – I found that my most painful time was not when the product suddenly died, but when the product was suffering on the edge of death, neither completely died, nor too much hope of life. < / P > < p > the taxi spirit of the team will be very low, and some people may choose to leave. At this time, the determination of leaders is very important. Leaders need to show the spirit that I will support you even if the sky collapses tomorrow. They also need the optimism that even if they go to execution tomorrow, they will still have fun today. This is actually the determination of leaders. < / P > < p > I have met many leaders who have great anxiety when the project is in deadlock. This anxiety can easily spread to other people in the team, and eventually form a depressive and pessimistic atmosphere in the team, which is not helpful to solve the problem. < p > < p > monk Tang is the most determined person in the Sutra collection in the West. Monk Tang’s determination comes from his seeing the distance and his firm direction. Even if everyone gives up in the middle of the journey, he can still go to the West and get the Sutra. < / P > < p > my habit of writing weekly newspaper “at length” was formed when I worked with the leaders of start-up companies. I will not only review the work goals and achievements of the past week in the weekly newspaper, but also write a lot of analysis and Reflection on my team, project and myself. < / P > < p > every time the leader reads the weekly newspaper, he will discuss some of the views with me. He will help me sort out and analyze some problems from a more mature perspective. So in more than a year of working with that leader, I will see my growth with naked eyes. < / P > < p > but now I seldom write weekly reports, or simply carry out business review and work summary in the weekly reports, not because I am lazy to grow up, but because I am in an environment that attaches too much importance to the results and ignores personal growth. < / P > < p > after leaving the company, the leader also used his relationship to help me find a new way out, although I didn’t go there for various reasons. But actually let me know – the original good leadership is not only my superior, but also my possible guide and noble on the road of life. < / P > < p > when we work in the workplace, we naturally have superiors. To a certain extent, leadership determines our rising and development space, and even changes the direction of our career. So it is very important to judge whether a leader is worth following. < / P > < p > similarly, if we change our roles, we may also be the leaders of others. What can we do with the above points? This is also a question worthy of reflection. Xiaomi new machine real machine exposure center dig hole screen design or high color thousand yuan machine