Is Android fragmentation really a problem

First, let’s talk about why there are fragments. There are several different reasons for the presence of debris. First, it’s customized by the manufacturer. The first manufacturer to use sense was HTC. Later, you will see many manufacturers follow suit. Everyone from Samsung to Motorola is using custom skin trends. These customizations bring a unique look and function to the device, making each manufacturer unique in the market.

the second reason for fragmentation is software updates. Unfortunately, many phone manufacturers will stop supporting their devices in a year or two. This means that every year, with a new version of Android, new features will not be updated on old devices. The update comes from the mobile phone manufacturer, but is launched by the operator. In most cases, the manufacturer and the operator are jointly responsible for releasing updates.

as far as my Galaxy note II is concerned, I’ve been waiting for my KitKat update, but I’ve never succeeded. Sprint released KitKat for their note II, but T-Mobile didn’t. I learned firsthand how frustrating it was to wait for the carrier. I have two years of note II. By the time I got rid of it, note 4 was on the market and had been updated to lollipop.

now, let’s talk about how Google can solve the fragmentation problem. I think the first step is to make Android more like windows. My strokes here are not big. When I say “make Android more like windows,” I specifically refer to their updates. If you have a Windows PC, updates will be available when Microsoft releases them, regardless of who made them. Not only that, you can easily build your own PC and install windows without becoming a developer, manufacturer, or the like. Windows size fits all packages. However, Android must be customized for your device. Of course, a developer can migrate functionality from one ROM to the next, but he or she still has to go through a process to do so. If you’re not a developer, you can’t afford it.

now, let’s talk about what manufacturers can do to resolve debris. First, they can exclude carriers. I’m not sure why it’s necessary to go through the carrier first, but Motorola has done it recently, though not quite. When they announced the launch of the new moto x, G and e models, they said they would not be able to get them from the carriers, or at least not under those names. In doing so, Motorola bypassed the carrier. Now, Motorola can choose how and when to release updates, rather than the carrier. At least that’s how it works in theory. In the long run, we will have to see how it actually works.

OK, so after all, I asked the first question. Is there really a problem with fragmentation? I don’t think the answer does. On the one hand, I think the customization of manufacturers is great. That’s one of the reasons Android is so good. They give you a choice. They give you a choice. If you don’t like the existing Android, you can choose Samsung with touchwiz, HTC with sense or other favorite phones. Most importantly, a lot of features are eventually added to later versions of Android, but some of the customization settings are too high, adding useless bloating to already good devices. Samsung’s eye tracking, for example, causes more headaches. Most people turn it off.

when your hardware runs out of time, fragmentation can also become a problem. But this is not just unique to Android. This is also the case for apple when older iPhones don’t run the latest and best IOS versions. This happens to windows machines when they no longer meet the minimum requirements for running the operating system. Of course, at least the main difference in this respect is that the PC can be upgraded to have updated CPU, GPU, more RAM, more storage space, updated motherboard, etc.

Author: zmhuaxia