Why not ban apples? It’s simple! We are not the winners of the Pandora box

Introduction: Recently, due to the increasingly tense confrontation between China and the United States in the field of science and technology, the voice of some foreign enterprises has begun to appear in China. After Huawei, the U.S. ban on tiktok has been hot, so the domestic began to call for a ban on apple. Strange to say, it seems that every time this happens, the spearhead will be directed at Apple. However, it has not changed the fact that Apple mobile phones, tablets, computers have become popular electronic products. < / P > < p > first of all, it needs to be made clear that the blind prohibition of Apple itself is a very irrational practice and also a violation of the WTO agreement. Some people say that the United States can prohibit the enterprises of our country on the ground of “national security” in disregard of WTO regulations. Why should we abide by it? < / P > < p > as a developing country, if we do not comply with it, it will only leave other countries with more arguments, and it will be even less conducive to maintaining China’s image and status in the world. There is no doubt that we are not the winners of banning apple and opening the Pandora’s box. On the other hand, if the United States forbids Chinese enterprises, the United States will naturally be injured. Countries such as Europe, Japan and South Korea will benefit from it, and the United States will ultimately benefit. < / P > < p > from the current point of view, there are two countries that ban Apple sales, one is Russia and the other is Turkey. Russia’s approach is very simple. It directly requires that all smartphones sold in Russia must be installed with a security software. However, Apple’s closed route is naturally unacceptable, so apple is banned in the Russian market. Turkey said Apple violated one of its rules, so Apple was banned. < / P > < p > since July 1, Chinese regulations have strictly prohibited applications that do not comply with China’s national regulations from being put on the Apple App store. Tens of thousands of mobile games will be taken off the shelves due to the lack of version numbers, which will directly affect Apple’s revenue. This means that the “privilege” Apple has enjoyed for many years in China has finally been cancelled! According to Apple’s official website, Apple has created 5 million jobs in China through supply chain cooperation, procurement and investment, among which more than 1.8 million jobs are supported through Apple App Store ecology. Don’t underestimate 5 million jobs. There are tens of millions of Chinese families behind them. If Apple’s mobile phone supply chain is not filled by domestic manufacturers < / P >, it is believed that some domestic manufacturers can not fill the gap. But the huge apple supply chain, how can it be said that it can be changed. According to the 200 core suppliers released by apple in 2019, China has 41 enterprises, and 46 in China’s Taiwan. < p > < p > Huawei mobile phones are facing the dilemma of “no core”, so it is very difficult to take over such a huge supply chain. Xiaomi, oppo, vivo and other domestic mobile phones basically take the low-cost route, and the quality requirements of the supply chain are relatively low. In addition, banning Apple would lose hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes. Therefore, banning apple at this time is definitely not a good choice. According to the latest DIGITIMES report, macbook sales in the third quarter increased by 20% over the same period last year, with strong demand for Apple products in the Chinese market. Some time ago, the major e-commerce platforms held a grand 618 event, and apple mobile phone can still make a lot of money! Data is the fact, domestic brands should learn from Apple brand! < / P > < p > in 2020, there has been a lot of talk about the major Internet giants moving the supply chain out of China. At present, Apple’s supply chain has not left China, precisely because today’s “made in China” is still the best choice. The perfect ecosystem also constitutes the huge stickiness of China’s supply chain. However, multinational enterprises are only temporarily unable to leave. Once there is a better alternative, it does not mean that they do not intend to move the supply chain away from China. Huawei has finally made a choice! Xiaomi and ov have also followed up. Have you ever thought about today?