You know what? Android was not originally designed for mobile phones

As we all know, smart phones have two major operating systems: Apple’s IOS and Google’s Android. Among them, smart phones using Android system occupy more than 80% of the market share, which shows that it has a huge role in promoting the development of smart phones. But few people know that Android wasn’t originally designed for mobile phones, it was digital cameras. < / P > < p > although this may seem strange, it is. Rubin, the father of digital cameras, was originally designed for Android in 2013. The plan is to create a camera system platform that includes cloud storage for images and videos. In this way, users may not have to rely too much on the camera’s built-in storage and can easily access photos from multiple devices. Rubin even showed his ppt which introduced the idea to investors in 2004, but failed because of the low interest of investors. < p > < p > after a setback, Andy Rubin and the team decided to change the strategy. They found that the camera market wasn’t big enough, and smart phones were in their infancy, and they saw the opportunity. After some modifications to the original system, Android, which can be used on mobile phones, was born. < / P > < p > and in the beginning, they didn’t want to charge for the system like their competitors. They wanted Android to be free and could be used as a platform for installing other software and services. Because by offering the system for free, many mobile phone manufacturers will be happy to cooperate with them. The idea of < / P > < p > was undoubtedly correct, but at that time, it needed the support of well funded partners. So Google appeared. Google acquired Android in July 2005, and plans to occupy 9% of the market share in North America and Europe in the next five years. As a result, by the end of 2010, Android had about 24% of the market share in North America, well above the original plan. Because of its open source and free features, Android system has won many users, until it has become one of the two major operating systems. < / P > < p > from the current perspective, it is correct to switch to the field of smart phones instead of insisting on the digital camera operating system, especially the explosive growth of smartphone sales and the shrinking of digital camera sales in recent years. In addition, if Andy Rubin didn’t insist on the system being open and free at that time, it might not have been the result today, and even Android might become the cannon fodder of the smartphone system controversy at that time. < / P > < p > so history is always full of drama. If Google didn’t choose Android at that time, Microsoft might have achieved greater success by virtue of Windows Mobile, and Nokia, the former mobile phone overlord, would probably continue to cultivate Symbian system. Fortunately, history has always been in the right direction, and Android has finally been successful. Straight screen S20! Samsung Galaxy S20 Fe exposure: 1Hz high brush + snapdragon 865